Ancestry Solutions'
 Ancestral Collectives

Eleanor Mary VAUGHAN

Eleanor Mary VAUGHAN[1, 2, 3, 4]

Female 1839 -

Personal Information    |    Sources    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Eleanor Mary VAUGHAN 
    Born 11 Oct 1839  Brompton, Little Chelsea, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Female 
    _UID 9EF0AAF388A22C42A96BB18658E10030771F 
    Person ID I1888  Chamberlain Family
    Last Modified 1 Dec 2017 

    Father Charles VAUGHAN,   b. 19 Apr 1803, Mitcham, Surrey, England Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 8 Jun 1866, Chelsea, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age 63 years) 
    Mother Virtue POULSOM,   c. 31 Mar 1811, Melksham, Wiltshire, England Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 5 Nov 1863, Chelsea, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 52 years) 
    Married 26 Dec 1832  St. Mary Abbots, Kensington, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location  [5
    _UID 6B34B295317D5B498733F1F8813906EA8593 
    Family ID F104  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    Family William KNIGHT,   b. 1832, Needham Market, Suffolk, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Married 3 Nov 1857  Islington, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location  [6
    _UID 3E73AB746E76C34199D9356864502221BEDE 
    Children 
     1. Eleanor Alice KNIGHT,   b. 25 Sep 1858, Islington, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     2. Ada Eliza KNIGHT,   b. 25 Aug 1860, Islington, Middlesex, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     3. Josephine Maud KNIGHT,   b. Jul/Sep 1862, Islington District, Middlesex, England (1b, 150) Find all individuals with events at this location
     4. Jeannette KNIGHT,   b. Jan/Mar 1867, Camberwell District, Peckham, Surrey, England (1d, 625) Find all individuals with events at this location
     5. William Arthur KNIGHT,   b. Apr/Jun 1869, Camberwell District, Peckham, Surrey, England (1d, 583) Find all individuals with events at this location
     6. Walter Ernest KNIGHT,   b. 1 Feb 1871, 50 Clifton Road, Camberwell, Surrey, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     7. Fred Bernard KNIGHT,   b. Jan/Mar 1873, Camberwell District, Peckham, Surrey, England (1d, 772) Find all individuals with events at this location
    Last Modified 15 May 2022 
    Family ID F735  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

  • Sources 
    1. [S9] 1861 Census, England and Wales, Office of National Statistics, General Register Office, Kew, Surrey, England, (Name: U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah;), Islington, Middlesex, England, RG9/146, ED 37a, fol. 107,p. 41, GSU #0542581.
      Household schedule number: 246

      William Knight 38
      Eleanor M Knight, wife, married, 26, born Brompton, Middlesex
      Eleanor A Knight 2
      Ada E Knight 7 Mo
      Ann McGrann 17

    2. [S71] 1871 Census, England and Wales, Office of National Statistics, General Register Office, Kew, Surrey, England, (Name: U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah;), Camberwell, Surrey, England, RG10/734?, ED 24, p 22.
      Schedule No. 94, 50 Clifton Road,
      William Knight, head, married, 35, redundant Custom's Clerk, Examiner's Department, born Suffolk, Needham Market
      Eleanor M. Knight, wife, married, 31, born Middlesex, Brompton
      Eleanor A. Knight, daughter, single, 12, scholar, Middlesex, Islington
      Ada E. Knight, daughter, single, 10, scholar, Middlesex, Islington
      Josephine M. Knight, daughter, single, 8, scholar, Middlesex, Islington
      Jeannette Knight, daughter, single, 4, scholar, Surrey, Peckham
      William A. Knight, son, single, 2, scholar, Surrey, Peckham
      Walter E. Knight, son, single, 2, scholar, Surrey, Peckham

    3. [S21] 1881 Census, England and Wales, Office of National Statistics, General Register Office, Kew, Surrey, England, (Name: U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah;), Camberwell, Surrey, England, RG11/689, ED 38, fol. 128, p. 35.
      Schedule No. 182, 50 Clifton Road,
      William Knight, head, married, 46, Clerk Accountant General's Office, H.M. Customs, born Suffolk, Needham Market
      Eleanor M. Knight, wife, married, 42, born Middlesex, Brompton
      Eleanor A. Knight, daughter, single, 12, scholar, Middlesex, Islington
      Ada E. Knight, daughter, single, 20, milliner, Middlesex, Islington
      Josephine M. Knight, daughter, single, 18, scholar, Middlesex, Islington
      Jeannette Knight, daughter, single, 14, scholar, Surrey, Peckham
      William A. Knight, son, single, 11, scholar, Surrey, Peckham
      Walter E. Knight, son, single, 10, scholar, Surrey, Peckham
      Frederick Bernard Knight, son, single, 8, scholar, Surrey, Peckham

    4. [S61] 1891 Census, England and Wales, Office of National Statistics, General Register Office, Kew, Surrey, England, (Name: U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah;), St. George, Lewisham, Greater London, England, RG12/521, ED 14, fol. 197, p. 31.
      Schedule No. 180, 77 Blythe Vale,
      William Knight, head, married, 56, living on own means, born Suffolk, Needham Market
      Eleanor Mary Knight, wife, married, 51, born London, Brompton
      Josephine Maud Knight, daughter, single, 28, milliner dress, employed, London, Islington
      William Arthur Knight, son, single, 21, C.C. bookkeeper, employed, London, Peckham
      Walter Ernest Knight, son, single, 20, Salesman woolen whse., employed, London, Peckham
      Frederick Bernard Knight, son, single, 18, scholar, London, Peckham

    5. [S5] Parish Register, Church of England, (Name: U.S.A., Salt Lake City: Genealogical Society of Utah;).
      An abstract of the entry of the marriage of Charles Vaughan and Virtue Poulsom has finally been found and obtained. With the aid of www.familyhistoryonline.net the long elusive marriage was discovered having been indexed in the West Middlesex Marriage Index.

      Charles and Virtue were both single at the time of their marriage and each of them specified that they were resident in the parish of St. Mary Abbots, Kensington where the marriage took place.

      The most exciting discovery, however, was that the abstract included the names of the two witnesses at the marriage: Sarah Susannah Seaton and William Seaton. Follow-up of this new Seaton clue is underway.

    6. [S110] Parish Register, Church of England, (Name: Not Published;), Islington, Middlesex, England, p. 65, entry no. 129.
      1857. Marriage solemnized at the parish church in the parish of Islington in the County of Middlesex, entry no. 129
      When married 3 Nov 1857
      Groom: William Knight, full age, bachelor, clerk, residing at 1 Church St., Arlington Square, father was Edward Knight, gent.
      Bride: Ellenor [sic] Mary Vaughan, full age [sic], spinster, no occupation, residing at 1 Church St., Arlington Square, father Thomas Charles Vaughan, gent.
      Married in the parish church according to the Rites and Ceremonies of the Established Church, by banns by L. Stanham, Curate
      Signed William Knight and Ellenor Mary Vaughan
      Witnesses: Tho. C. Vincent, S. A. Vincent
      Initially when we were contacted about this marriage for Eleanor Mary Vaughan there were two many elements of the event that did not match the known facts of the family - her father's name was recorded as Thomas Charles Vaughan and not Charles Vaughan as he had been christened and known through all census and registrations. He was described as a Gent when in fact he had never reached the status of a Gent and was unlikely to in his trade as saddler and cab proprietor. The bride, herself, was described as being of full age, when it was known that if she had stated her true age it would have been 17 or 18, at least 3 years under the age of no parental consent required. Charles Vaughan was not a witness on the marriage so we can only presume that he and her mother were not aware of the marriage or had raised no objections during the banns process. It was only upon seeing the names of the two witnesses after the most recent discovery of Eleanor's sister, Susannah's marriage, to Thomas C. Vincent that the names of the witnesses would make perfect sense in the context of a marriage between Susannah's sister, Eleanor with any other individual, in this case, with William Knight.